Elsewhere in this edition of eNews, we provide a detailed summary of the AIHW report. Just a few of the statistics about which we should be terribly alarmed include the following:
- An extraordinarily high percentage – 87% – of Queensland children in detention during 2017-18 were on remand (i.e. they were not sentenced to detention by a court). The national percentage was 60%, dragged up by the high Queensland number.
- Problems caused by the high number of Queensland children on remand were compounded by the length of their remand periods. Nationally, the length of remand periods ranged from a low of 33 days in South Australia to a high of 63 days in Queensland.
- Gross over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander in detention was apparent in all States and Territories, but Queensland was worse than elsewhere – 32 times the non-Indigenous rate in Queensland compared with 23 times the non-Indigenous rate nationally.
No reasonable person can be unmoved by the starkly presented case studies that informed the Four Corners’ story. No reasonable person can be left not wondering why these children were remanded in custody, why these children were left languishing on remand for so long and in such inhumane conditions, or why, even without knowing the nature of their alleged offences, they were arrested and charged in the first place when there are other options available to the Police.
In previous editions of eNews and our blogs, PeakCare has applauded the Palaszczuk Government’s investment in a range of youth justice reforms and we continue to do so. However, the Government’s admission that use of watchhouses to accommodate children on remand is likely to continue for several months until the impact of a number of these strategies take effect demands that some more immediate actions are taken, at least, on an interim basis.
PeakCare’s view is that it should not be left to the youth justice system alone to address these problems and it is never good policy to mis-use a system such as youth justice to address the shortfalls or failings of other systems with which it intersects, such as those responsible for policing; court administration, legal representation and advocacy; child protection and family support; youth mental health and disability support services; and youth housing, income support, education and vocational training – all of which have contributed to the problems now being faced and have obligations to now actively contribute to the solutions. PeakCare remains strongly committed to continuing to play our part in working with the Government on finding and implementing the best possible solutions and trust that all our Members share this commitment.
Click here to express your commitment and state any other opinions you may hold. Speak up!